Redskins Transactions: 2012 Offseason
- 1niksder
- **********
- Posts: 16741
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
- Contact:
Redskins Transactions: 2012 Offseason
OC Will Montgomery: 4 Years, $12 Million
DE Darion Scott: 2 Years, $1.4 Million
TE Fred Davis: Franchise Tagged
OG Kory Litchtensteiger: 1 Year RFA Tender, $1.2 Million
K Graham Gano, 1 Year ERFA Tender, $540,000
DE Darion Scott: 2 Years, $1.4 Million
TE Fred Davis: Franchise Tagged
OG Kory Litchtensteiger: 1 Year RFA Tender, $1.2 Million
K Graham Gano, 1 Year ERFA Tender, $540,000
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
-
- kazoo
- Posts: 10293
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
- Location: Kazmania
- 1niksder
- **********
- Posts: 16741
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
- Contact:
The ERFA tender is for vet minimum for a player with two seasons under their belt.KazooSkinsFan wrote:I think Gano should have to pay us more then that to stay on the Redskins...
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
-
- ^^^^^^^
- Posts: 9017
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
- Contact:
-
- the 'mudge
- Posts: 16632
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
Fletch, I'm certain, will get done. I worry about Carriker. He was quietly efficient, and the return of Jenkins can only help him... Carriker is a perfect fit for Haslett's scheme...
Keep in mind, if the intent is to get RGIII, the cost will be the ability to replace FA losses via the draft... If we must replace key D players, we may loose... or severely limit... our ability to go after the #2 pick.
Keep in mind, if the intent is to get RGIII, the cost will be the ability to replace FA losses via the draft... If we must replace key D players, we may loose... or severely limit... our ability to go after the #2 pick.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
-
- the 'mudge
- Posts: 16632
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
Which is better... Jarvis Jenkins with Carriker... or Jarvis Jenkins with Scott?Chris Luva Luva wrote:Two words. Jarvis Jenkins.frankcal20 wrote:If Carriker leaves, if Scotts our next man up, we're going to have a HUGE fall off. We have to bring back Carriker & Fletch. Those are my two biggest concerns right now.
That's the issue, Chris...
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
Coach has said, one of the main reasons for last seasons failure, was the lack of depth. (In his eyes at least).
Why would they drag their feet on getting Fletch and Carriker re-signed?
Jenkins is a rookie coming off of a pretty serious injury. Granted, I think the guy is gonna blow up this year but, Its still an uncertainty.
If you have Carriker in the rotation on D-line, it keeps all of them fresh, with little to no drop off in talent.
I would get these 2 signed without ever sniffing the free-agent market. I mean maybe their agents are advising otherwise but, the players have both stated they want to be a Redskin next year.
Why would they drag their feet on getting Fletch and Carriker re-signed?
Jenkins is a rookie coming off of a pretty serious injury. Granted, I think the guy is gonna blow up this year but, Its still an uncertainty.
If you have Carriker in the rotation on D-line, it keeps all of them fresh, with little to no drop off in talent.
I would get these 2 signed without ever sniffing the free-agent market. I mean maybe their agents are advising otherwise but, the players have both stated they want to be a Redskin next year.
-
- FanFromAnnapolis
- Posts: 12025
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
- Location: on the bandwagon
- Contact:
It's possible both want to at least test the market to see what they might get elsewhere, and if they want to be Redskins next year then I'm sure they'll give the team a chance to match.jmooney wrote:I would get these 2 signed without ever sniffing the free-agent market. I mean maybe their agents are advising otherwise but, the players have both stated they want to be a Redskin next year.