crazyhorse1 wrote:Simmer down now.
I can't simmer down, I'm not simmered up. Your post is inane and shows everything I said about liberals.
crazyhorse1 wrote:You invite the assumption that you are a right winger, and possibly a Republican in Libertarian clothing.
Liberals have nothing in their arsenal except anti-Republican talking points, so that I have never, ever supported Republicans or Republican positions ever just doesn't deter you, you inanely post that I must be a closet Republican so you can pull out the anti-Republican talking points. Thank you for so clearly demonstrating my point.
crazyhorse1 wrote:Your special scorn is heaped on liberals (who are usually Democrats)
First, I realize in your world there are only Republicans and Democrats, but try to imagine someone who is neither. I know it's hard for you, but try. Now, why would you assume that person would hate both parties equally?
Second, it's liberals that keep arguing with me, not Republicans so maybe I've had a little more chance to express my distain of their views. We haven't really discussed issues i"m disgusted with Republicans on like Terry Scheivo, the drug war, their insistance on moralistic legislation, their ever growing love and trust of government or so on. When liberals argued with me was I supposed to come up with some anti-Republican arguments that had nothing to do with the topic?
Third, right now Republicans are useless and Democrats are hysterical. In that case, who will draw your ire more?
Fourth, those are reasons you see more dislike of liberals, but still it's true I dislike liberals more and the reason is that in the end there is no freedom without money. I can fight moralistic Republican laws. The ever growing desire of the left to confiscate my paycheck is more scary to me because moralistic laws can be undone but government programs never end.
crazyhorse1 wrote:and your obvious hatred for spending funds on the poor
Thank you for this comment in your post demonstrating the incredible slow learning rate of liberals. I say people should start effective charities rather then relying on corrupt, ineffective government and I will contribute more then my share and you post this gem I hate spending on poor. Thank you, thank you very much for demonstrating again my point.
crazyhorse1 wrote:is apparently not balanced by your nonexistent hatred or lack of knowledge of welfare/tax breaks/legislation/spin designed to enhance the power of the elite.
I wish we were in smack here, I'm really trying to stick to the post. So I will just say left spin aside these are areas libertarians typically agree with Republicans on and disagree with Democrats, so it's not demonstrating anything.
crazyhorse1 wrote:You seem to be relatively blind to GOP catering to Corporations, contempt for the environment , and support of social and economic inequites, as well as its falsehood and manipulation of the press. Libertarians, generally, are not so keen sighted in relation to the left and then so blind or subdued in regard to the right. Until your worldview is more balanced
Dude, they are BOTH CORRUPT. Your post is the result of running that through your liberal filter that there are only Republicans and Democrats. It's the only way you can solve the conflict a Democrat thinks Republicans are corrupt and a Republican thinks Democrats are and someone says both are. You just can't process the dichotomy so this is what you post. Thank you, thank you very much for again demonstrating my point.
crazyhorse1 wrote:, it will be difficult to accept you as a libertarian, no matter how many times you say you are.
Thank you again for posting your support of my point.
Crazyhorse, "You are not a liberal, so you are a Republican. That makes it impossible to see you as a libertarian."
Again, your post demonstrates my point on the slow learning of liberals oh so effectively.
You know what would be more compelling that i am not a libertarian if you are right? Rather then posting i'm not a libertarian because i"m not a liberal why don't you try arguing my views are not libertarian? They are, but if that's your thesis it's the point you should address.
I don't follow. 
