2 INT's for EX-Skin

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:53 pm

Walt Harris had 2 int's today.

ii7-V7 · Post by **ii7-V7** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:01 pm

I remember how everyone claimed that he was so horrible.....but I sure would like to have him now!

fredp45 · Post by **fredp45** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:05 pm

why? So he can make tackles 8 yards downfield?

Our front 7 stink this year...it ain't the back 4.

ii7-V7 · Post by **ii7-V7** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:33 am

fredp45 wrote:why? So he can make tackles 8 yards downfield?

Our front 7 stink this year...it ain't the back 4.

I'm not so sure I agree with that. I think our front 11 suck...as well as our back 11!

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:30 pm

We arn't even going to get started on Carlos Rogers lack of coverage.

die cowboys die · Post by **die cowboys die** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:24 am

chaddukes wrote:
fredp45 wrote:why? So he can make tackles 8 yards downfield?

Our front 7 stink this year...it ain't the back 4.

I'm not so sure I agree with that. I think our front 11 suck...as well as our back 11!

and don't forget the "Sideline 16"! they also suck.

HailSkins94 · Post by **HailSkins94** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:43 pm

Walt Harris has 5 INT's on the year. The Redskins defense has 3.

Redskin in Canada · Post by **Redskin in Canada** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:53 pm

I have an idea! :idea:

Let us review the accomplishments of every past Skins who has had a decent season so far. No, not all of the departed only the ones who have had a decent season. It is time to make us feel as bad as possible during these cheerful moments. :roll:

It is called masochism.

ii7-V7 · Post by **ii7-V7** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:49 am

Redskin in Canada wrote:I have an idea!

Let us review the accomplishments of every past Skins who has had a decent season so far. No, not all of the departed only the ones who have had a decent season. It is time to make us feel as bad as possible during these cheerful moments.

It is called masochism.

Yeah, but I think of it as evidence that the armchair coaches don't really know how to evaluate talent as well as they think that they do. There is a reason that this guys is still playing at a high level.....and a reason why our secondary is now like a sieve. We are minus Harris, and Clark; two people who most people really didn't think were our strongest attributes.

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:19 am

I agree with RiC and chaddukes. . .criticism of letting Clark go I can understand, but I'd like to see people calling the loss of someone like Harris a mistake when it happens next time, before we hear a mid-season report.

I remember that CLL was sad to see Wilds go but I don't remember any words about Harris as he left. . . My 2 cents

ii7-V7 · Post by **ii7-V7** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:02 am

Irn-Bru wrote:I agree with RiC and chaddukes. . .criticism of letting Clark go I can understand, but I'd like to see people calling the loss of someone like Harris a mistake when it happens next time, before we hear a mid-season report.

I remember that CLL was sad to see Wilds go but I don't remember any words about Harris as he left. . .

I vehemently defended Harris when he was here, but I was the only one. I wasn't happy to see him go, but I understood that his cap number was kind of high, so I didn't balk too much.