The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

I agree that this is a worthless topic, and an argument created by very unhappy, very vocal extreme liberals. Unfortunately, I believe they will ultimately have their way on this one. If and when that day comes, however - and for as long as I live afterwards - they will ALWAYS be the Redskins to me ...

Very cool. Ty brutha.

On Nov 16, at 4:58 pm I'll be in the 9-Year Club.



I've only been here six years, but most of you guys tell me it feels like, well, forever. I guess I'm just kinda neat like that...

Seriously, I want to thank you, BH, as well as the locals - you know who you are - whose posts I see every time ...

Check the ignition. Nice post bro. Good to have you back. Hail to the Redskins.

The ignition! Of course, now I remember. Good looking out brother. And thanks for the sentiment. Yes indeed, forever - no matter what our society of rampant, uncontrollable, runaway liberalism will soon force upon us ...

It helps if you run the game... Unfortunately, DM already thought of that...


...just sayin...

Well, isn't that peachy. Maybe the two of us 'trey can come up with an even bigger spinny wheel thingie so Darth misses a couple weeks this coming season. Heck, it worked so well on me I forgot to make ...

Darth, I'm impressed. Two Hog Bowls and two Championships in 3 years? Dang man - you are to Hognostications what the SEC is to college football. That's it - this year I am figuring out some way to cheat...

This situation has revealed some truths about Snyder and this organization.


1. Snyder is still an idiot.
2. Bruce Allen and company are "yes men".


Snyder has totally screwed himself. He's been overly demonstrative in his unwillingness to listen. The words and tone of his messages have done ...

No, but I've seen George Preston Marshall being accused of naming the team that because he was a racist, and the fact that the Danny won't change the name showing that he is racist as well. There was a New York Times editorial a couple of weeks ago comparing Snyder's refusal to change the name to ...

While I get your point, I think the "sensitivity" is a result of the word "skins" being in the name (at least that is my take). That said, if they changed the team name to "whiteskins" -- I couldn't care less. The real question is why now --- the name made it through the WWII and the civil rights ...

Man, I don't know. It is starting to look inevitable, which sucks. I'll still love 'em like before, but it won't be quite the same. You fellas probably feel the same way. All because of some yokels who don't have enough to deal with in living, period, but have to actually seek out additional ways to ...

Countertrey wrote:How can you possibly have 79 points, when there have only been, like, 15 games played?

There's something fishy going on here....

Because I am so Hognostically challenged, each of my winning selections counts thrice.

Thanks SJ! It's actually 79, but we're in the general vicinity...

:q

Thanks man! I know I can always count on you -




to lead me down the primrose path.

I would like to ask everyone in this thread who wants Merriwether gone a question:

incendiary comments aside, how is he supposed to man his position in the new NFL? Hit WRs high it's likely targeting. Arrive just when the ball does it might be a defenseless receiver flag. Depending on that play's ...

'trey.

A RESOUNDING +1 my brutha!

-hey, are there any games this week?

I don't have any problem with what chiefhog wrote above or really any of your comments.

Personally though, I've just had enough of the constant turnover. We've all acknowledged that Shanahan inherited an abomination of a roster. We didn't have a QB. And there is no arguing that the two year cap ...

IIRC that was you, 'trey.


...I used to pick em by the pretty colors...

And dropping like a boulder in some kinda stronger-than-Earth-gravity thingie. (I was told there'd be no science either; I just signed up for Phys. Ed.)

Man, I remember when I used to know at least a little about the NFL...

Darth -

See my 2nd edit in an earlier post. Problem resolved. Thx for your patience and help brother.

Once upon a time I would've scoffed at anyone suggesting that the Redskins might one day have to change their name. Now I'm not so sure. The more I read about this the more support seems to be growing in favor of the vociferous few who CHOOSE to take offense. And WTF is Obama doing weighing in on ...

SkinsJock wrote:you were at 43 wk 4 and picked 9 correctly wk 5 ... 43 + 9 = 52

that is one of the "advantages" of running our own thing ...

A-ha. But I was told there'd be no math -

Countertrey wrote:+1...



Can he be permanently in 5th place?




BTW... BRD... there are no games this week...

ROFL! I see how it is now, 'trey. Bastage...Good thing there are no games this week; it'll give me a little time to work on my, er, situation.

52? You lost me SJ. DM, I am really sorry for all the drama, and I don't want to create more work for you or anyone else (besides me that is) by tracking my weekly picks manually. If it has to be done tell me what I need to do and when I need to do it, and I'll handle it okay? Thanks.

EDIT ...

Okay!

I have discovered the problem - but I have no idea how to fix it. I may be scrooged; in fact, I probably am. Somehow I signed in last week with an account (remember my initial sign in?) that was NOT BRD, but Sean Stewart. My picks this week went on the same account. Thing is, I have tried ...

IIRC I made the picks Tue, def no later than Wed. last week. They were, in no particular order:

CLE
IND
STL
KC
BAL
NYG
NO
NE
GB
ARI
DEN
SF
SD
ATL + 48 (Friggin Falcons are KILLING me this year)