The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Wjy is it that I've only noticed one bad apple among all these Bengals fans. Everyone else has had a lot of class. They know that both of these teams are bad and struggling. Well done to most of you Bengals fans that braved these waters. GG

Agreed, except for the guy who started this thread you ...

Ramsey did not start early enough to make a game making difference. (Remember, HE was the one that got us our 10 points, not Brunell) If Ramsey had started this game, I think we would've won for sure. Here's why: Marvin Lewis would have been afraid of putting too many players in the box because ...

Just be careful not to behave like a hot dog here. Or we will teke you to the smack forum.[/quote]

That's not my style,but if you wanna talk smack I can do that all night!

Good luck on the rest of this season Hogs. We should have beaten you guys worse than what we did.

And ou guys that doubted us let me just ask you this.....WHO DEY???

NC43Hog wrote:When I came up with the concept, it was more making fun of those god aweful uniforms - I actually think the Fab5 would approve.

Those threads are awesome!

That was weak. The orange jerseys are awesome!

santana aint done a damn thing all season.

chad if not top 5, hes top 8 in the league.

No one put Santana in the top 5, but Santana and C. Johnson have similar numbers, as was pointed out in another thread.

Yes I know. I misread it. I've been switching back and forth from my work and this ...

Redskin in Canada wrote:VA Bengal. You are an OK guy. Welcome to our board. I hope you stick around after the game, win or lose.

Well thanks man. Will do...You guys are alright here.

Gibbs already stated that he wouldn't put Ramsey even if we are out of contention.[/quote]

Why? I mean I know you guys are paying him a s!!t ton, but why wouldn't you make a switch if Brunell isn't getting it done?

So do you guys think Gibbs will make a switch if Brunell has a bad game this week?

cj7 wrote:Dan Wilkinson?

Mistake for us as well.

1niksder wrote:

VA Bengal wrote:Didn't you say Randy Moss was about equal to Chad Johnson there creamy?

Re-read the post .... for the third time that was Santana Moss that I compared Johnson to not Randy. Two different players same last name

OK OK...My fault.

DEHog wrote:He's good but the Steelers go down this week..you heard it here first!

I agree. If not this week definately next...when they come to "The Jungle".

1niksder wrote:Chad has been playing for 4 years Andre is in his 2nd Johnson should have higher numbers
I made my choices based on the 2004 season and the players that I think are the top 5
You can think what you want about Chad Johnson but I don't have to agree

OK buddy.

Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Are you going to list yours, or just keep on telling me that Chad is not in the top 5?
I guess I have to spell it out for you
1.Randy Moss
2.Terrel Owens
3.Marvin Harrison
4.Torry Holt
5.Andre Johnson

Now do you understand ...

They had the number one overall pick. Were they going to draft a defensive end?

Do you have to draft a QB just because you have the #1 pick?

No, the O-Line isn't "pretty bad" we are having success running the ball. It's not the strongest unit on the team, but it's not the weakest either ...

Why are you assuming none of us have seen him play?

Wasn't the Denver game nationally televised?

Don't you think that maybe at least some of us have NFL Sunday Ticket.

Don't you know that your head coach was our defensive coordinator, and has many fans in the Washington (and Baltimore) areas ...

Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Just wondering why you think Andre Johnson is better than Chad since you're so big on numbers?

Andre Johnson- REC:111 YDS:1,669 AVG:15.0 TD:8

Chad Johnson- REC:231 YDS:3,474 AVG:15.0 TD:18

It appears that you think ...

1niksder wrote:Not a bad list but you have the wrong Johnson that should read Andre

Are you going to list yours, or just keep on telling me that Chad is not in the top 5?

Because you don't play your first year doesn't mean you get to be a rookie the next

No technically he's not a rookie but this is the first season he's actually played. So it's kinda like being a rookie. Is that clear enough for you?

no one
but you guys keep saying Chad Johnson is in the top ...

There are many great receivers in the NFL, so I definately don't take offense if someone doesn't think Chad is a top 5 receiver. Plus Chad doesn't have the longevity, but after watching him play every week I think he is a top 5 receiver.

There are still many people who haven't been exposed to CJ ...

So who do you guys think are 5 receivers in the NFL? Here's my list.

1.Randy Moss
2.Terrel Owens
3.Marvin Harrison
4.Torry Holt
5.Chad Johnson

I thought that the Chargers gave up on him too soon and that they didn't need to draft a QB. Drew would be a good pick-up for anyone, but are you guys sure that your problem is the QB? Isn't your O-Line pretty bad? It's hard for a QB to suceed if he doesn't have time to throw.

Definately skill. The man is a beast! He's also got some luck on his side. He's lucky he was drafted by Pittsburgh. Talk about a rookie QB's dream.

Hines Ward has a rookie QB throwing to him. Johnson actually has a 2nd-year QB throwing to him. Yes, there is a difference, Palmer has been a pro for a year, and while not having the playing time makes him "like a rookie" in some respects, he has had much more time with the coaches and the playbook ...